When Were Build Over Agreement Introduced

Okay, when they built the extension in 1992, should they still have kept getting a construction agreement? If that had been the case, would it have been taken up as part of the construction application? No, not planning – building control. In 1992, they would have needed a superstructure agreement if the drain had been divided at the back AND the house was pre-1937. If it was not adopted at the time of construction of your extension, there should not have been a construction agreement. It is almost impossible to obtain information from the Water Board to confirm whether a building permit should have been in place or whether the sewer was previously private and transferred due to the Private Sewer Transfer Regulations, 2011. Therefore, it becomes difficult to satisfy a commercial lender who is beyond consent. A commercial lender must be satisfied that in a situation where a funeral home needs access to a sewer under a lot, the work will not affect the value of the property and the security of the bank, and there must be some certainty as to the liability of a funeral home legally required to compensate for damage caused in the absence of a formal construction agreement. If a construction contract has not been concluded, the seller must have a CCTV inspection of the sewer carried out and transmit the images to the water company. If the water company is satisfied that the sewer is in good condition, it will issue an administrative letter confirming that the sewer is in satisfactory condition. The comfort letter usually convinces the buyer and their mortgage lender that the water company will not take steps to demolish the offensive structure above the public sewer. The transfer of private sewers has been largely beneficial for state-owned enterprises and water companies. It has relieved the public of the responsibility for sanitation and placed it exclusively in the hands of water companies, which are much better equipped to maintain the sewer system. While confusion persists when it comes to issues such as construction over sewers, there is no doubt that homeowners are ultimately better protected than from transmission.

However, after the transfer, we now have sewers that were built without consulting Severn Trent Water. Obviously, this worries homeowners who are not sure what would happen if there were a problem with these sewers. You must ask the sewer company when the sewer was adopted as part of the extension. I hope it was not accepted during the construction of the extension, in which case you would not have needed a construction agreement. Find your cheapest energy and monitors to let you know when to change again. When private sewers were transferred in 2011, the majority of private sewers and runoff in England and Wales were transferred to public ownership. Thousands of kilometres of pipelines – for which the owners (often unbeknownst to) are responsible – were the responsibility of the water companies. .

Comments are closed.