<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Amped D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.daryll.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.daryll.net</link>
	<description>The world from the view of a post production startup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why American Home Shield is a Rip Off by David Macmillan</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/12/why-american-home-shield-is-a-rip-off/comment-page-1/#comment-20631</link>
		<dc:creator>David Macmillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=32#comment-20631</guid>
		<description>AHS sent a plumber to my house last week after the handle that operates my shower, came off in my hand, and water was squirting out of the valve and the shower head with no way to turn it off other than shutting the main water valve off. No water for toilets cooking or cleaning. AHS sent out a plumber within 6 hours who told us that it broke from too much force, and that it would cost $700. dollars to fix, and AHS wouldn&#039;t cover as it was my fault. He said he would have to break through the dry wall, and the marble tile to get to the pipe. We asked for a second opinion, and the next guy said the same thing.  My 74 year old step father, an retired elevator mechanic came to help, and saw that a retaining clip was holding the broken valve in place. He got it out with my needle nose pliers, turned the water on and the pressure pushed the valve forward enough to easily pull it out. He replaced the broken valve himself, and the shower was repaired for the price of the new valve. Both the plumbers, plus the other repairmen that have come to my home were from the same european country, they convinced AHS not to cover the cost of the repair, and the cost of fixing the problem was tantamount to thievery.  I am canceling my contract that I have had for ten years.  It has cost my much more than I would have saved by paying up front costs myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHS sent a plumber to my house last week after the handle that operates my shower, came off in my hand, and water was squirting out of the valve and the shower head with no way to turn it off other than shutting the main water valve off. No water for toilets cooking or cleaning. AHS sent out a plumber within 6 hours who told us that it broke from too much force, and that it would cost $700. dollars to fix, and AHS wouldn&#8217;t cover as it was my fault. He said he would have to break through the dry wall, and the marble tile to get to the pipe. We asked for a second opinion, and the next guy said the same thing.  My 74 year old step father, an retired elevator mechanic came to help, and saw that a retaining clip was holding the broken valve in place. He got it out with my needle nose pliers, turned the water on and the pressure pushed the valve forward enough to easily pull it out. He replaced the broken valve himself, and the shower was repaired for the price of the new valve. Both the plumbers, plus the other repairmen that have come to my home were from the same european country, they convinced AHS not to cover the cost of the repair, and the cost of fixing the problem was tantamount to thievery.  I am canceling my contract that I have had for ten years.  It has cost my much more than I would have saved by paying up front costs myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why American Home Shield is a Rip Off by penny cohen</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/12/why-american-home-shield-is-a-rip-off/comment-page-1/#comment-20411</link>
		<dc:creator>penny cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=32#comment-20411</guid>
		<description>I had trouble with American Home Shield warranty.  I was told they had to replace my compressor for my heating pump and it would cost me $1060.00.  It wasn&#039;t up to code and all of that.  Also I believe the service that replaced it didn&#039;t use the right size.  My heater is constantly on and I keep it at 65 degrees.  You have better make sure you read your contract.  They really are not worth. I&#039;m terrified of what my electric bill will read when I get it?  I wonder if I should obtain a lawyer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had trouble with American Home Shield warranty.  I was told they had to replace my compressor for my heating pump and it would cost me $1060.00.  It wasn&#8217;t up to code and all of that.  Also I believe the service that replaced it didn&#8217;t use the right size.  My heater is constantly on and I keep it at 65 degrees.  You have better make sure you read your contract.  They really are not worth. I&#8217;m terrified of what my electric bill will read when I get it?  I wonder if I should obtain a lawyer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fios HD After Switching to Tivo HD by daryll</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2007/10/fios-hd-after-switching-to-tivo-hd/comment-page-1/#comment-19816</link>
		<dc:creator>daryll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/archives/17#comment-19816</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not doing anything really tricky with the Phillips. I&#039;ve got a Fios SD receiver box. I connected the SVHS output and audio to the Tivo. I use the IR blaster to control the receiver box. Tivo handles the guide data themselves. So the Phillips box calls in to Tivo to get the guide updates.

I was a relatively early adopter for Tivo so that Phillips box with lifetime service has worked out to be a great deal. I hope I get as much out of my HD Tivo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not doing anything really tricky with the Phillips. I&#8217;ve got a Fios SD receiver box. I connected the SVHS output and audio to the Tivo. I use the IR blaster to control the receiver box. Tivo handles the guide data themselves. So the Phillips box calls in to Tivo to get the guide updates.</p>
<p>I was a relatively early adopter for Tivo so that Phillips box with lifetime service has worked out to be a great deal. I hope I get as much out of my HD Tivo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fios HD After Switching to Tivo HD by Greg Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2007/10/fios-hd-after-switching-to-tivo-hd/comment-page-1/#comment-19809</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/archives/17#comment-19809</guid>
		<description>You were able to get a Phillips Series One Tivo to work with FIOS?  That&#039;s neat, I have one of those with lifetime service, and I thought it was going to be obsolete once I switch to FIOS for video (only using the Internet right now).  Any chance you could give a quick outline of which FIOS box you hooked that up to, and how you got the Tivo to control it/grab guide info?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were able to get a Phillips Series One Tivo to work with FIOS?  That&#8217;s neat, I have one of those with lifetime service, and I thought it was going to be obsolete once I switch to FIOS for video (only using the Internet right now).  Any chance you could give a quick outline of which FIOS box you hooked that up to, and how you got the Tivo to control it/grab guide info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why 3D TV Technology is Coming by daryll</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/08/why-3d-tv-technology-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-11334</link>
		<dc:creator>daryll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=24#comment-11334</guid>
		<description>Jim, you&#039;re right that&#039;s another source of good content. There are several firms working in that realm including InThree, and Tim Sasoon&#039;s shop.

The current cost is a bit high given the number of screens that are showing 3D today, but that too should change over the next year.

Thanks for the addition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, you&#8217;re right that&#8217;s another source of good content. There are several firms working in that realm including InThree, and Tim Sasoon&#8217;s shop.</p>
<p>The current cost is a bit high given the number of screens that are showing 3D today, but that too should change over the next year.</p>
<p>Thanks for the addition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why 3D TV Technology is Coming by Jim Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/08/why-3d-tv-technology-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-11329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=24#comment-11329</guid>
		<description>Our company converts 2D to 3D. For library or current production. Our converted pictures can play on any projection system and on any 3D enabled monitor. HD or DVD. Any player. 1,2,6 and 8 and off you go. The future of consumer home video in 3D is the array of titles available. Not just current titles although they are sure to lead the way, but library pictures that are suitable for conversion with great stories and that enhance the viewer experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company converts 2D to 3D. For library or current production. Our converted pictures can play on any projection system and on any 3D enabled monitor. HD or DVD. Any player. 1,2,6 and 8 and off you go. The future of consumer home video in 3D is the array of titles available. Not just current titles although they are sure to lead the way, but library pictures that are suitable for conversion with great stories and that enhance the viewer experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why 3D TV Technology is Coming by daryll</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/08/why-3d-tv-technology-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-11300</link>
		<dc:creator>daryll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=24#comment-11300</guid>
		<description>Chris, you&#039;re right that I sort of glossed over the solution that required two projectors and polarized glasses. I could have gone on about how synchronizing multiple projectors and was problematic, and how they typically used linear polarizes which means head tilt caused cross talk. Of course distributing twice as many prints and having twice as many projectors made them cost prohibitive.

But since I wasn&#039;t doing a treatise on the history of 3D and I figured my post was getting long enough, I skipped that. My comments were directed at the modern solution and the anaglyph information was provided only as historical background. I didn&#039;t give the impression that polarization is new, I never said that. You misinterpreted the post.

Since you question my credentials, I&#039;ll go ahead and provide them. I&#039;ve been working in imaging and the film industry for almost 20 years. I&#039;ve been involved in the making one major 3D production (Terminator 2-3D). I&#039;ve been involved in the making of a couple dozen major motion pictures, and have film credits in two that won academy awards for their visual effects. My current business provides cinema display systems including 3D to companies such as Disney and Technicolor. Maybe you&#039;d like to do your homework (a simple IMDB search would have worked) before you attack someone&#039;s credibility?

Go ahead, what&#039;s your background in the industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, you&#8217;re right that I sort of glossed over the solution that required two projectors and polarized glasses. I could have gone on about how synchronizing multiple projectors and was problematic, and how they typically used linear polarizes which means head tilt caused cross talk. Of course distributing twice as many prints and having twice as many projectors made them cost prohibitive.</p>
<p>But since I wasn&#8217;t doing a treatise on the history of 3D and I figured my post was getting long enough, I skipped that. My comments were directed at the modern solution and the anaglyph information was provided only as historical background. I didn&#8217;t give the impression that polarization is new, I never said that. You misinterpreted the post.</p>
<p>Since you question my credentials, I&#8217;ll go ahead and provide them. I&#8217;ve been working in imaging and the film industry for almost 20 years. I&#8217;ve been involved in the making one major 3D production (Terminator 2-3D). I&#8217;ve been involved in the making of a couple dozen major motion pictures, and have film credits in two that won academy awards for their visual effects. My current business provides cinema display systems including 3D to companies such as Disney and Technicolor. Maybe you&#8217;d like to do your homework (a simple IMDB search would have worked) before you attack someone&#8217;s credibility?</p>
<p>Go ahead, what&#8217;s your background in the industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why 3D TV Technology is Coming by Christopher Mohr Sr.</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2008/08/why-3d-tv-technology-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-11297</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Mohr Sr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/?p=24#comment-11297</guid>
		<description>Why do people who comment on 3D and profess to know something about the art, always wind up showing how they didn&#039;t do a very good job of research and therefore make anything they say suspect?

daryll revealed his sloppy research by the following statement:

 &quot;In previous incarnations of 3D you would wear a pair of paper glasses with red and cyan filters. That allows only red light to enter one eye and anything but red to enter the other eye. The left and right stereo images are then processed so that one has only its red values, and the other has the green and blue values. Your brain then reassembles the images in to 3D. This process is called anaglyph 3D. The big advantage of anaglyph 3D is that you can display the images using standard film/print technologies. The downside is that it is a really awful 3D image. Creating the image requires throwing away have the information available, and because it isn’t the way your brain is used to seeing 3D it can lead to eye strain and headaches.&quot;

Any decent 3D movie from the fifties was always presented with polaroid glasses and a silver or aluminized screen.  Anaglyphs were used for kiddie movies and comic books.  He gives someone the impression that the use of polarization in the 3D process is part of a new technology, and it certainly is not.

Do your homework guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people who comment on 3D and profess to know something about the art, always wind up showing how they didn&#8217;t do a very good job of research and therefore make anything they say suspect?</p>
<p>daryll revealed his sloppy research by the following statement:</p>
<p> &#8220;In previous incarnations of 3D you would wear a pair of paper glasses with red and cyan filters. That allows only red light to enter one eye and anything but red to enter the other eye. The left and right stereo images are then processed so that one has only its red values, and the other has the green and blue values. Your brain then reassembles the images in to 3D. This process is called anaglyph 3D. The big advantage of anaglyph 3D is that you can display the images using standard film/print technologies. The downside is that it is a really awful 3D image. Creating the image requires throwing away have the information available, and because it isn’t the way your brain is used to seeing 3D it can lead to eye strain and headaches.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any decent 3D movie from the fifties was always presented with polaroid glasses and a silver or aluminized screen.  Anaglyphs were used for kiddie movies and comic books.  He gives someone the impression that the use of polarization in the 3D process is part of a new technology, and it certainly is not.</p>
<p>Do your homework guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fios HD After Switching to Tivo HD by daryll</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2007/10/fios-hd-after-switching-to-tivo-hd/comment-page-1/#comment-5401</link>
		<dc:creator>daryll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/archives/17#comment-5401</guid>
		<description>Right, VZ doesn&#039;t charge extra for the HD channels just for the HD boxes, so by paying my $6/month for the cable cards I&#039;m all set.

I&#039;m using the Tivo HD not the series 3. The Tivo HD supports M-card, has smaller capacity (but you can add an external drive), has a lower end front panel, isn&#039;t THX certified, but is also half the price. That was a reasonable trade off for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, VZ doesn&#8217;t charge extra for the HD channels just for the HD boxes, so by paying my $6/month for the cable cards I&#8217;m all set.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using the Tivo HD not the series 3. The Tivo HD supports M-card, has smaller capacity (but you can add an external drive), has a lower end front panel, isn&#8217;t THX certified, but is also half the price. That was a reasonable trade off for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fios HD After Switching to Tivo HD by Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.daryll.net/2007/10/fios-hd-after-switching-to-tivo-hd/comment-page-1/#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.daryll.net/archives/17#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>Hey - great posts. I have been trying to find out for days now whether or not I can forego the acquisition of the FIOS HD DVR (when they are ever available). The TiVo UI is so far superior to ANY DVR interface, it&#039;s just not fair. Obviously, I want TiVo.

I was wondering; do you only pay VZ for the cablecards? Or do you still have to pay them the monthly HD charges as well? Which TiVo DVR are you using? Series 3 (I hope)? Thanks, and these are the best posts I&#039;ve found on this so far.

- DT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; great posts. I have been trying to find out for days now whether or not I can forego the acquisition of the FIOS HD DVR (when they are ever available). The TiVo UI is so far superior to ANY DVR interface, it&#8217;s just not fair. Obviously, I want TiVo.</p>
<p>I was wondering; do you only pay VZ for the cablecards? Or do you still have to pay them the monthly HD charges as well? Which TiVo DVR are you using? Series 3 (I hope)? Thanks, and these are the best posts I&#8217;ve found on this so far.</p>
<p>- DT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
